THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ASSERTION, REASONING, EVIDENCE, AND LINK BACK (A.R.E.L) TO ENHANCE STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMAN 4 BANDA ACEH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2019/2020)
View/Open
Issue Year
Abstract
ABSTRACT Defi Irmayanti. 2020. The Implementation of Assertion, Reasoning, Evidence, and Link Back (A.R.E.L) to Enhance Students' Speaking Ability (An Experimental Study at Second Grade Students of SMAN 4 Banda Aceh in Academic Year 2019/2020). Thesis, English Education Department, STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena. Advisor I. Sri Wahyuni, M.Pd, Advisor II. Mulyadi Syahputra, M.Pd. This study attempts to examine the effectiveness of Assertion, Reasoning, Evidence, and Link Back (A.R.E.L) to enhance students' speaking ability and the students' perception about the use of A.R.E.L in teaching speaking. The population of this research was second grade students of SMAN 4 Banda Aceh which consist of 250 students and there were 26 students at class XI IA 2 as the sample of this experimental group. This study was pre-experimental design with one group pre-test post-test. The instruments of this research were test and questionnaire. The finding of this study revealed the mean score of pre-test was 59,42 and post-test was 62,73, and the standard deviation for pre-test was 5,37 and post-test was 4,72. Thus, the result of this study shows that t-test was 2,36 and t-table was 1,71. It showed that t-score is higher than t-table (2,36 > 1,71) which means that alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. Moreover, motivate students to speak in front of class and effect students understanding in giving their argument. It can be conclude that the implementation of A.R.E.L enhances students' speaking ability and students got a positive impact after learning A.R.E.L in speaking class. Keywords: Speaking, A.R.E.L (Assertion, Reasoning, Evidence, and Link Back)
Keywords
Speaking, A.R.E.L (Assertion, Reasoning, Evidence, Link Back)
References
REFERENCES
Arikunto S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatandan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Baso, F. A. 2016. The Implementation of Debate Technique to Improve Students' Ability in Speaking.Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Longman
Brown, H. D. 2004. Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education
Bungin, H.M. & Burhan 2008. Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif: komunikasi, ekonomi, dan kebijakan public sertai lmu-ilmu social lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana
Cameron. 2001. Working with Spoken Discourse. Oxford: SAGE Publications, Ltd.
Freely & Stainberg. 2009. Argumentation and Debate; Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK. 286.
Iqramullah. 2019. Potential Use of AREL in English Song Analysis to Improve Argumentation Skills and English Proficiency.International Journal of Research in English Education (2019) 4:1Downloaded from ijreeonline.com on October 25, 2019
Kreiger. 2005. Teaching Debate to ESL Students: A six-class unit. The Internet TESL Journal.
Khoironiyah. 2011. The Implementation Of Debate In Teaching Speaking At Eleventh Year Students Of SMA Negeri 2 Rembang. FKIP UNIROW Tuban.
Malasari L & Purwanti. 2018. The Effectiveness of Debate Technique Toward Students' Confidence in Speaking Skill at XI Grade of SMKN 2 Tembilahan. WEJ, Vol 2 No 2 September 2018 (https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.Vol2.Iss2.366,accessed on October 14, 2019)
Maulana. 2018. The Implementation of Debate Technique (Asian Parliamentary) Concept Toward Students to Increase Speaking Ability.Skripsi.STKIP BinaBangsaGetsempena Banda Aceh.
Muhammadin, F. M. 2014. Handbook for Competitive Debating: Asian Parliamentary Format. (R. Fadzila, Afri, Ed.) (Third Edit, Vol. Third Edit). Yogyakarta: Jogja Debating Forum.
Richards, J. C. and Theodore R. S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, JC. 2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking: from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rieke R.D. 2012. Argumentation and Critical Decision Making. Downloaded from :https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235419889 on January 29, 2020.
Rubiati R. 2010. “Improving Students' Speaking Skill Through Debate Technique”. Thesis. Semarang: Walisongo State Institute for Islamic Studies. Accessed on September 30, 2019.
Syahputra M. 2019. Duolingo Gamification: Does It Reduce Students' Grammatical Errors in Writing. Accessed on December 20, 2019 from http://geej.stkipgetsempena.ac.id/?journal=home&page=article&op=view&path%5B%=137
Sonnreich, T. 2012. Monash Association of Debaters Guide to Debating Tips, Tactics, and First Principles. Accessed on June 20, 2019 fromhttp://www.monashdebaters.com/downloads/Tim%20Sonnreich's%20Guide.pdf
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian, Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: AFABETA,cv.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif. Bandung:Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2013. MetodePenelitianKombinasi (Mixed Method). Bandung: Alfabetha
Sari L. 2004. Assessing Speaking.Cambridge University Press.
Rahmawati A &Syafiq A. N. 2017. Improving Speaking Skill through British Parliamentary Debate by Using AREL for Nursing Students.
Wahyuni S. 2019. Pembelajaran Berpikir Kritis Menggunakan Classroom Debate System; di adaptasi dari British Parliamentary System. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing
Wahyuni S. 2018. The obstacle in teaching speaking by using debate techniue. Accessed on December 22, 2019.