THE LANDSCAPE OF COMPETITIVE DEBATE IN ACEH
View/Open
Issue Year
Abstract
This Study aims to to investigasi the landscape of competitive debate among the universities in Aceh. This instrumens were questionnaire, interview, and the document analysis. The research subject of the study were the debaters in several universities in Aceh which were randomly chosen to avoid the subjectivity of the result of the study. Based on the result, the researcher can concluded that: firstly, the achievement rate of the competitive debate in Aceh private universities was low. The conclusion was taken from the discussion process of the questionnaire, interview , and the LLDIKTI's record. There was a high coherency of result between the interview and questionnaire showing that the achievement rate was low. The result was also strengthened by the LLDIKTI's document about the result of National University Debating Championship (NUDC)2021. Secondly, the participation rate was also low. The result of interview and questionnaire showed that the number of debaters who often participate in competitive debate was very low. There was no one of debaters that has ever participated in more than 4 debate competitions. Moreover, the majority of the debatersparticipatedinlessthan3debatecompetition.TheLLDIKTI'srecord used by the writer also became the amplification of the validity of the result. The three of data sources indicated the coherency. Hence, the rate of participation in the competitive debate among the debaters of Aceh private universities was still severely low,too. Thirdly, according the survey and interview, the researcher concluded that the rate of debaters' interest in debate among the Aceh private universities was stable. The result was a little higher than the rate of participation and achievement. However, the debaters interest still needs to be increased. The result of the interview regarding the excitement rate was high while the result of questionnaire regarding the implementation of the interest was not too low and not too high, too. Finally, the rate of the support system was the highest rate of the competitive debate landscape in Aceh private universities. The result between the questionnaire and the interview about the rate of support system was greatly higher. It means that the result was reliable. The researcher found the coherency between the questionnaire and the interview result.
Keywords
Landscape, Debate, Competitive Debate
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ary, D., et al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. New York: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Cresswell, John. 2008. Educational and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Person Education
Cambridge Union Society. 2015. What is debating?. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20150814220549/https://cus.org/member s/deba ting/what-debating. Diakses pada 15 Juni2021
Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2006) Doing Case Study Research. A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Teachers College Press. New York
Harvey, N., & Smith. (2011). The Practical Guide to Debating Worlds Style/British Parliamentary Style. New York: International Debate Education Association
Iqramullah. (2017). The Landscape of Competitive Debate in Aceh. The 1stInternational Conference on Language, Literature and Teaching (2017) Retrieved from.researchgate.net
Moleong, L. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Edisi Revisi.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Moleong, L. J. 2007. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya
Othman, M., F. Mohamad and F. Amiri, 2015. The Effect of Debate Competition on Critical Thinking among Malaysian Second Language Learners. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 23 (4): 656-664,
2015
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2013. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Universitas Press.
Pradana, S. A. (2017). Using Debate to Enhance Students' Speaking Ability.
Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris , 149-163.
Rodger, D; Stewart-Lord, A (2019). Students' perceptions of debating as alearning strategy: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice.
Sari, alfia. (2019). An analysis of debate content delivered by speaking for debate students. Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Peneltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV
Sugiyono, (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabetha, CV
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung, Alfabeta, CV Sundari. 2017. The Application of Debate Technique Toward Students' Speaking Ability. Banda Aceh: Getsempena English Education Journal
Syahputra, M., Wahyuni S & Qamariah, H. 2019. Pembelajaran Berpikir Kritis Menggunakan Classroom Debate System; di adaptasi dari British Parliamentary System. Banda Aceh: BandarPublishing
Syarifah, M. (2016). Metode Pembelajaran Debat. https:// www.msyarifah.my.id/ model-pembelajaran-debat/
Sri Wahyuni, Mulyadi Syahputra and Defi Irmayanti. 2020. The Implementation of Assertion, Reason, Evidence, and Link Back (AREL). Getsempena English Education Journal.
http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/ENGEDU/article/view/7943/4469