AN ANALYSIS OF ADJUDICATORS' FEEDBACK STRATEGY IN COMPETITIVE DEBATE
View/Open
Issue Year
Abstract
This study is aimed to analyze the adjudicators' Feedback strategy in Competitive Debate. It was conducted to know what the strategies of adjudicator while giving feedback are. The method used in this study was qualitative research. The research design of the study was content analysis. The primary data were data analysis from recorded adjudicator feedback in competitive debate at NUDC 2020. The technique used in collecting the data was Seven-Step Model by Onwuegbuzie and Frels, there are; (1) Exploring the topics, (2) Initiating the Search, (3) Storing and Organizing Information, (4) Selecting/Deselecting Information, (5) Expanding the Search, (6) Analyze the information, and (7) Present the Report. The result revealed that all adjudicators used opening statement, decision, and reasoning but the first and third adjudicators have introduction when giving feedback. The way of the first adjudicator while giving feedback started from the fourth rank then compare to third, second, and first rank, while the fifth adjudicator started to compare with the first, second and third rank. When adjudicators want to give feedback for the third rank, all of them compare to second and first, second to first. Lastly they glorify the idea of first rank. After that, the third and fourth adjudicators compare between opponent debate which is the second and first to the third and fourth rank before comparing the fourth rank to other position. Finally all of adjudicator give closing and asked to approach them at discord if they still hard to understand their feedback.
Keywords
Debate, Competitive Debate, Adjudicator feedback strategy
References
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta.
Ary, D., et al. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. New York:
Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Barkley, F. 2005. Collaborative Learning Technique. San Francisco. London.
Pearson Longman.
Blainey, Geoffrey. 2004. A very short history of the world. London: Allen Lane.
Brown, H. D. 2013. Teaching by principles: An Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Longman
Borysowich C. 2006. An Observation Check Sheet.
(https://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/glossary/observation-checklist.
Diakses pada 20 Januari 2021)
Cambridge Union Society. 2015. What is debating?.
(https://web.archive.org/web/20150814220549/https://cus.org/members/deb
ating/what-debating. Diakses pada 15 Juni 2021)
Devania, Annesa. 2015. Wawancara Mendalam (indept Interview)”.
(Http://www.ut.ac.id/html/teknikwawancara.htm, diakses tanggal 25
Desember 2020)
Donna T. Andrew. 2002. Popular Culture and Public Debate. in The Historical
Journal Vol. 39, 406
D'Cruz, R. 2003. The Australia-Asia Debating Guide. Australia: Australian
Debating Federation.
Elo S, Kaarianinen M, Kanste O, Polkki R, Utriainen K, & Kyngas H. 2014.
Qualitative Content Analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open. 4:1-
10.
Grandy, G. 2018. An introduction to constructionism for qualitative researchers in
business and management. In: Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A.L., Grandy, G. (eds.)
The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research
Methods, pp. 173–184. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson
Education
Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. 2006. Doing Case Study Research. A Practical
Guide for Beginning Researchers. Teachers College Press. New York
Harvey, N., & Smith. 2011. The Practical Guide to Debating Worlds Style/British
Parliamentary Style. New York: International Debate Education Association
Iqramullah. (2019). Potential Use of AREL in English Song Analysis to Improve
Argumentation Skills and English Proficiency. International Journal of
Research in English Education (2019) 4:1 Retrieved from. ijreeonline.com
on October 25, 2019.
Lazaraton, A. 2001. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd
Edition) : A journal. United States of America. Thomson Learning Inc.
Mayzuhroh, U. 2018. Adjudicator's Oral Feedback in British Parliamentary
Debate. Surabaya. UNESA
Moleong, L. J. 2007. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung. Remaja
Rosdakarya
Nirwana, S.C. & Kurniawat, N. 2018. Arel to Enhance Students' Speaking Skills
in Debating. Journal Joepallt. Vol 6, No 2 (pp. 1-16). Universitas
Suryakancana. Retrieved from https://
https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/jeopallt/article/view/413/326.
Pradana, S. A. 2017. Using Debate to Enhance Students' Speaking Ability. Jurnal
Tadris Bahasa Inggris , 149-163.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Rivera, K.D. 2018. ‘Use Your Feelings': emotion as a tool for qualitative
research. In: Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A.L., Grandy, G. (eds.) The SAGE
Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods, pp.
450–467. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
Rodger, D; Stewart-Lord, A. 2019. Students' perceptions of debating as a learning
strategy: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice.
Rubiati R. 2010. Improving Students' Speaking Skill Through Debate Technique.
Thesis. Semarang: Walisongo State Institute for Islamic Studies. Accessed
on September 30, 2019.
Sari, alfia. 2019. An analysis of debate content delivered by speaking for debate
students. Universitas Negeri Surabaya